The Tactics of Immigration

tac·tic

/ˈtaktik/
noun
     an action or strategy carefully planned to achieve a specific end…
.
Immigration is a form of demographic genocide which, either by design or consequence, results in ethnic cleansing. In addition to this, Western governments are effacing their European populations by promoting a variety of other schemes such as miscegenation, abortion, homosexuality, gender dysphoria, and White guilt. But immigration has been by far the most successful approach towards complete replacement; and if this does not drastically change within the next decade or so, Europeans will be the first race to become extinct.
.
So who within the political class is behind immigration policy? And how have they been able to coercively open the flood gates?
.
Whether the discussion begins with the diaspora after the Bar Kokhba revolt, or seeks to understand the role played by fifth columns during the fall of the Visigothic Kingdom to Moslem forces in 711 AD, there has been a continuous thread, over some 2000 years, of a Jewish influence within the lands inhabited by Europeans that has sought to undermine the integrity of cultural boundaries, and more crucially, the conception of borders. Through traitorous invitation, political realignments, or financial legerdemain, these alien forces have often contrived the social conditions and historical circumstances where kingdoms and nations went to war, peoples fled their homelands, and for those caught in between, a life of brutal misery. In such a frustrating and vicious cycle, a continual pressure has been placed upon the European race. Never has a group of people been so crushed over such a length of time. Even the Asian and African Kingdoms had centuries of relative peace here and there; but for simple Europeans, a steadfast, farming culture, which had natural ties to the land and each other—the past 2000 years has been a nightmare.
.
And it continues.
.
In the gristmill of the present era, we have observable evidence of a Judeo-Globalist conspiracy to open Western countries to the importation of countless non-White peoples whose sheer numbers will out-produce the native European populations. This current state of affairs can be traced back to the mid 1960s when, in just a few short years, every Western state changed—without any popular consent—the laws governing immigration policy. In every case, Jewish leadership was responsible for these changes. The resultant break up of the dominant, homogeneous, traditional European culture ensured that a small rank and file coterie maintained its grip over Western nations by excluding any possibility of a larger, racially European competitive group from rising to positions of influence. Moreover, the social stability within many European nations gradually became compromised as the original ethno-fabric unwound, creating greater mechanisms of control against the native populations, which further reinforced the absolute dominance by this coterie over state and culture.
.
The following is a shortlist of Western nations who adopted these democidal immigration policies after 1960 and the Jewish ringleaders behind these efforts:
.
The Hart-Celler Act (United States, 1965)
.

Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings for the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled “Let’s Open the Gates” in which a proposed immigration level of 500,000 people per year, for 20 years, was requested, with no restrictions on national origin.

Congressman Emanuel Celler, who had fought for unrestricted immigration since the 1920s in the House of Representatives, was the main writer of the legislation.

Leo Pfeffer, who wrote many treatises and books that acted as softening propaganda for open immigration, also co-conceived the legislated material.

Norman Podhoretz was a former Comintern sympathizer turned “Neo-Con” who became a close associate of the aforementioned men; he wrote numerous articles promoting open immigration.

And Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and B’nai B’rith, all filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee during the hearings prior to the Hart-Celler Act.

The Migration Act (Australia, 1966)

Walter Lippmann played a crucial role in pressuring the Holt government to do away with racial profiling against non-White immigration; he was president of the Australian Jewish Welfare Society which, among other services, offered financial support and housing to non-White immigrants to Australia.

John Malcolm Fraser was a cabinet member during the Holt government who went on to become Prime Minister of Australia (1975-83). His mother’s maiden name was Woolf, born of a South African Jew who emigrated to Australia. Despite being minister of the War Cabinet, his Liberal Party values did not stop him from advising on an “easing” of immigration restrictions. This sympathy no doubt gave him a leg up on his competitors when he campaigned for Prime Minister a decade later.

The British Nationality Act (The United Kingdom, 1981)

The Labour Party, true to its Marxist roots, began a series of Nationality Acts from 1948 onward that established the rule of jus soli, whereby citizens of the British Commonwealth could now migrate to Britain.

Ralph Miliband was born in the Jewish Quarter of Warsaw. He emigrated to England in 1940. After the war, he joined the Labour Party, despite his hatred for English culture, and proceeded to become an intellectual proponent of the New Left. His writings and lectures proved influential in the reworking of several British Nationality Acts over the decades, as they became increasingly more open to non-White immigration.

Maurice Edelman was a lifelong Member of  British Parliament. He was a francophile and admirer of David Ben Gurion. His efforts over the years as a Labour Party MP included a number of published works, several of which sought to influence how Britons saw themselves. Like many of his ilk, he considered the peoples of Britain to be the ancestors of migrants.

Canada, Germany, Sweden, France, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and so many others, also had major overhauls to their National Immigration policies during the same period. The mainstream narrative explained this phenomenon as a development of lower birthrates among natural Europeans; then there was a financial reasoning behind the influx, one which argued the fallacy that Western countries had a desperate shortage of low-skilled workers; and now the latest explanation for mass immigration has been given: that Europeans need to become more diverse—despite the demonstrable fact that about 97% of all hair colours, and 96% of all eye colours attributed to human beings belong exclusively to the European haplogroup.

The explanation that we are never given is simply this: that an internationalist cartel, operating within Western nations, has designs on governing the planet at some point in the future. They have shared this common goal since the Age of Revolution; and this, in part, helps explain why their long term plans always go unnoticed—because they think in terms of centuries, while Europeans can only see from one generation to the next. And it matters not what one calls them: Liberal, Globalist, Socialist, Communist, Cultural Marxist, or Jewry—in toto they are one and the same. They desire a one world cultural order, ruled by a centrally controlled government, with all of humanity under its thumb. And for them, European nationalism, since 1848, has been a barrier to that goal…

Therefore, Europeans must be replaced.

This philosophical point is essential to understanding their religion, or Globalism. Much of the world already operates in some manner like it, but conditionally, on a micro level—a subsistence version of it, a pseudo-communism if you will—due to poverty (Africa), culture (China), or caste (India). However, the individuality and free-spirited nature of Europeans and their ability to organize and express these traits through cultural celebration (nationalism) is a roadblock to world government. Even when given various forms of socialism to live by, many European cultures could just not adapt collectively or metaphysically to it. And once it becomes understood that the purest form of this doctrine, Communism, was simply a Jewish-designed belief system to persuade Gentiles to abandon the notion of property rights, relinquish their free will to an authority that ruled over them, and divorce themselves from the values of their culture and kindred inasmuch as they related to the state, then it makes perfect sense why the Europeans have stubbornly held their ground through dozens of the world’s greatest social cataclysms, of which the Bolshevik Revolution and World Wars were only a part.

And now the final push looms large. An army of culturally alien, hostile peoples have been brought into our midst. Many are males of military age. They want to pair up and breed with native European women, which our elected governments offer up to them; they want their own laws and cultural norms to be dominant; they defile our religious and historical spaces while waiting for the day when Western governments finally say to them: now go, kill the White menace. And to think that it all began with just a few modest initiatives, some cosmetic changes to our immigration policies only a few short decades ago, when a man like Enoch Powell could deliver a speech that still meant something…

Yes, there will be rivers of blood…

Advertisements

Who Builds Civilization? Or: Who is Destroying the West?

A culture is the sole prerequisite for the development of a civilization—better put: a cohesive, homogeneous, self-comprehending group is the fundamental bedrock to the idea. There cannot be civilization without this. Period. But to attain these elemental safeguards such as compatibility, unique identity, and collective awareness, there must be a driving will that governs the group consciousness. And in every case where a successful, enduring civilization was created, a racially motivated, conservative, patriarchal system can be distinguished as its constructing force. In Europe, this was the template for 3000 years; and now this is changing.

Group morality is the central structure of an articulated culture. It almost always begins when a racially developed core group has obtained its beliefs through evolutionary bias and group-based self-examination. Its opinions, belief systems, and comprehension of “right and wrong” are inherently bound to the developing, racial socialization of the group. Put more simply: there is a necessary bond between the members of a race that links them together far beyond the mundane forms of society and its infrastructures; and this familia supra omnia is deeply sublimated in a transcendental way. Many philosophers from antiquity were strangely correct when they claimed that each race had its own spiritual genus, or soul. And in Western Civilization for the past 60 years, this soul has been under attack.

So. Who are the Assailants? What are their methods? And what is their motive?

In his landmark book, The Culture of Critique, Dr. Kevin MacDonald effectively argued that through an uncanny form of group evolutionary strategy, the Jewish people of Europe (primarily the Ashkenazim) developed forms of alternative control within the political, economic, and social landscape of the European West. By usurping lines of communication, monopolizing the movement of goods, creating media empires and fiat currency, swapping out financial securities from government debts (then lending back into these), establishing think tanks and NGOs to subvert society at every point, bankrupting working classes, and then, when all else failed, manufacturing both European and Colonial wars—this group was able to out-maneuver the ruling elite of the West and, perforce, its peoples. In fact, one can assert that this foreign group now acts as the hand which guides the entirety of Western Civilization.

In other words, sovereignty has been a false idol here for a very long time.

To cover the myriad details in the methodology requires a book. And it must be encouraged that you read Dr. MacDonald’s work so as to comprehend the sheer scope of this group’s endevours against European culture. But from our perspective, after researching the primary reasons for these in-group strategies, the motives have always loomed hazily in the distance; and although they were not so easily understood at first, a grim conclusion persisted: That there is an Elite within the upper strata of the Ashkenazim whose sole purpose is the utter annihilation of the European racial core. And yes, this concept is alien to us. It is the most difficult idea to rationalize, especially for those coming from a European cultural milieu, wherein the humanities are integral to its scholastic sensibility. We recoil from these prospects, for they do not bode well for any other rationalizations that follow them. And yet it must be stated. This is the key to understanding the European predicament in the year of our Lord, 2016. And it is a predicament that will not change for several centuries…

But why? Why remove an entire racial group from the human historical process, especially one that has contributed far more than all the other racial groups combined? What benefit does it serve?

Well, if your in-group strategy is global hegemony, then your first priority would be to remove the primary competitor against you—even when this very same adversary was inclined to collaborate with you. Moses versus Pharaoh. This is the template—inverted to be sure; and the Hiburu have always defined themselves through conflict. But when you can persuade your enemy to fight himself, then you have learned a quintessential tool that can be passed down for generations. This is their wisdom.

Furthermore, following an implicit tenet guiding this system, they have understood that a virile, masculine, patriarchy—which has dictated European civilization for three millennia—is the most concrete impediment to their progress. To neutralize this cultural strength, they have instilled a sexually ambiguous, highly feminized set of social platforms within the society at large, encouraging unnatural and hyper-sexual behaviours in order to check the healthy, normalizing sexual interests within European communities. This lowers birth rates and depresses the racial sense of self-preservation. These vector points are usually softened following periods of academic agitprop and media boosting, policies that were best developed by the think tank groups that were allowed to escape Germany in the mid 1930s under the Frankfurt School umbrella. This nihilistic, post-communist philosophy of Critical Theory which these aliens created became what is now known as Cultural Marxism: the defining religion of European Exterminism.

But the greatest piece of black magic that these psychologists ever produced was that an entire race of people, through a strange form of legerdemain, was forced to see the entire cosmos through Ashkenazi eyes. Remember this statement for the rest of your life: we see the entire universe as they would have us see it. When Europeans peer into their own souls, when they consider their own values, estimate their self-worth, or their perspective on all things the mind perceives—all of it is muddied with an Halachic narrative filled with false morals and self-deception. They removed our classical Mythos by stealth, in which the older archetypes had been developed, where unambivalent morality coexisted with sexual division, while being set around family structures in order to maintain greater opportunity for the racial reproduction and social integrity of the group. This was normal. And this should still be the norm.

So as the West is quickly becoming infested with non-partisan, male youth from the third world, and while women of European descent are indoctrinated to miscegenate with alien groups outside of ours, we must begin to question the merit of the dupes who rule over us—our elected officials, bureaucratic legislators, and local authorities. They have not fulfilled their primary function, which is to secure and protect our native population, for they now serve Mammon. And besides, when did we ever ask to be replaced? Does our political class believe it has the right to replace us in this fashion? And if ballots no longer mean something, then is it not our godly right to take their authority away by any means possible? I should hope so.

The “White” Versus “European” Identity Crisis

The Mainstream narrative has narrowed its scope over the past ten years in what it defines as European culture. And this has been by design, as there is no evidence that it occurred organically. In fact, there is ample proof that the characterization of “Whiteness” and the deliberate dislocation of this modern concept from its cultural and racial core—that of a European realization and identity—has been a massive victory by the Liberal Elite over the collective consciousness of European peoples. Furthermore, this continued effort to abstract our self-identity into the synthetic abstraction which has come to be known as “White” will assuredly annihilate whatever sense of distinctiveness we still have left while leaving our entire group vulnerable to the racialist, marginalizing policies of the Cultural Marxist establishment. The whole point of this endevour has been to pacify the instinctive urge to defend one’s family, nation, and birthrights. It is that simple. The result has been the manufactured migration of 150 million non-Europeans into Australia, Europe, and North America over the past 50 years without a single significant incident of pushback. This could never have occurred with a group of people who were self-aware.

So, if race is a social construct, then why promote such an antithetical label as “White” into the mainstream dialogue so often? And why promote this label only in negative terms? Won’t people see through this at some point?

Well, the answer is twofold: The label is being sold to non-Europeans who will either justify further their victim status, or use it as invective against a competitive group; conversely, it is simultaneously being sold to Europeans who will begin to identify as “White”. The former transfers greater cultural power to an under-class of potential enemies to European culture; the latter arrests the development of European identity by making us ashamed of our selves while identifying with a negative, completely false concept that is empty of any content—in other words, we are now identifying with nothingness.  This must be repeated here: the MSM and the Cultural Marxist academic elite have essentially emptied Western society of its cultural content. And when you cannot identify with anything having such content, you have nothing left to defend. The nightmare of this scenario, and the black magic of those behind it should tell you how deep this group’s hatred of our people and culture runs.

This goes beyond simple genocide.

And while we are on the topic of genocide. If we were to use the standard definitions and legal criteria when using the term “White” to represent the native European peoples, then at least two of the five conditions have been met for establishing that genocide has been conducted by our political elites—with international entities in support—against the populations of Australia, Canada, the United States, and the EU. In the United Nations Convention on Genocide (see link above), both actions (c) and (d) were and are still being orchestrated against European peoples in the West, while the charge can be made that the latter portion of (b) has also been applied. But because race is a social construct, none of the claims above have any value since race only matters when it can be used to violate or dishonour native Europeans, or to entitle non-Europeans; just as race can be used to support the socio-political development of ethnic minorities, but must never be used to isolate the behavioural patterns of these very same groups for gathering statistical data.

The hypocrisy between these comparisons is obvious to most Europeans living in the West, but without a core identity operating, and the social consequences for those who speak against these discrepancies, only a few faint voices can be heard from the dark. And if you listen closely enough, you just might make out the last dying echo of an entire race of people…