Soft Borders and Globalisation

“Macbeth’s self-justifications were feeble—and his conscience devoured him. Yes, even Iago was a little lamb too. The imagination and the spiritual strength of Shakespeare’s evildoers stopped short at a dozen corpses. Because they had no ideology…”

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The Globalisation platform requires a myriad of transformations economically, politically, and socially before it can fully consolidate. Most importantly however, none of these matter if sovereign borders are not redefined or eliminated altogether; in fact, this has been the sole stumbling block over the past two decades since the breakdown of the Soviet Union. One of the keys as to why the Internationalists have failed to make greater strides recently is European nationalism. It will just not go away. And why should it? Generations have fought and died for ideas that were intricately linked to home and country. It runs as deep as instinct. Sublimate it a bit, and it is essentially spiritual. So then, in spite of this, how are the Political Elites dealing with it? Well, they have just decided to forget that borders even exist.

When Angela Merkel, against all logic or principle, invited the entire Third World—and by default, the whole of Islam—to safely enter the European continent, the first phase of a borderless system of governance was ushered in. By telling European member states to “stand down” before the massive inflow of millions, using threats of economic sanctions and blackmail to enforce compliance, the EU bureaucratic elite were able to give up an entire continent of nations and peoples without a single shot being fired. Even more stunning than this was the complacence with which it was met; and in some cases, was cheered on by the multitude of naive, Liberal Left youth of Europe. To make things more complex, the vast set of loans required for this operation which interlinked so many of the larger member states now created an economic pact of mutual self-destruction, thereby getting the European tax payer to finance his own doom.

A few leaders were not fooled by all of this. They knew that the cover story of so-called “Syrian Refugees” was a fraud; that it was vote swapping in the short run, and nation-breaking in the long run. But severe limits on sovereign decision-making since the Lisbon Treaty was signed handcuffed them. In Viktor Orban’s case (Hungary), despite a 98% vote against refugee quotas in the referendum this week, all of his work towards ending the migrant problem backfired as the turnout was too low. This was, in part, engineered by NGOs who told Left-leaning partisans not to vote at all, subsequently sabotaging the entire referendum. The Liberal youth were only too happy to listen, while they smugly laughed away their inheritance and future. So how is it possible that so many Europeans just don’t seem to care?

Well, the short answer is: they have been modeled to think in global paradigms. With the exception of Eastern Europe, where five decades of brutal Communism gave the nations who lived through it a healthy dislike for leftist macro-politics, the majority of Europeans have been pummeled with cultural indoctrination. A liberal, socialist worldview is the only intellectual, popular, and scientific narrative they have ever known. Since 1945, most European countries, and especially Germany, have been collectively ambushed by a coercive brand of thought reform, whereby a general sense of guilt is placed into a part of one’s personality core, which then acts as a regulator for filtering ideas and influencing modes of thinking. These “liberal” values are disseminated in school curricula, advertising, and entertainment. All of these “hubs” are operated and controlled by a Liberal Elite which is constantly vetting itself. No different than any run-of-the-mill Communist system—excepting of course the prisons and torture—just with the added touch of public porn and Hollywood glamour. So by entrenching a sustained guilt complex beneath all of this, the notion of a borderless world community begins to sound rather pleasant, perhaps even ideal. The ruling establishment then uses the fuzzy feelings this produces while committing genocide upon the European people—who even foot the bill for it!

 The tragedy of soft, open borders is a process that will play out over several generations. The cultural tensions on the streets of Canada, America, and Europe will seethe and boil, sometimes erupting into mob violence. And, as in the previous, most notorious attempt at mass culture-mixing in Russia, where the Bolsheviks murdered well over 50 million gentiles by moving great swathes of people across ethnic and religious boundaries like so many cattle, the popular unrest will need to be quickly and savagely put down. But the Russian Man still had his cultural memory, and resisted until the very end. In contrast, the domesticated, almost effete, Western male will not be up to the task; while his female counterpart will willingly go over to the other side as they are wont to do. Demographics will ensure that this cannot be solved in the democratic political sphere, and our very own socialist governments will not allow their immigrant voting machine come to any harm; so do not be surprised when the cross hairs of their ire are fixed on you when you speak up for your so-called rights…

 Welcome to the borderless state!



Gender Dysphoria and the Modern State

What do you get when you combine wanton narcissism, widespread nutritional deficiency, and spiritual melancholia? Answer: the contemporary genderless youth. And if that isn’t enough, the countless hours hovering over electronic devices, lack of outdoor activity, and a general disdain for healthy social diversions has brought the latest generation of Western youth to a point that now imperils the continued existence of our civilization. Even the usual disengagement of your typical youth, a malaise that has been ruthlessly fostered by the media elite ever since its victory over McCarthy in the 1950s, has an uncanny edge to it: this is an utterly nihilistic group of young people; and many of them literally do not care about anything but themselves. Sociologists will say this is predictable teenage behaviour going back to the stone age. Meteorologists will assert that this is evidence of Climate Change—but none of it deals with the root cause. For all of this is fostered by the individual postmodern personality. And in the following I will attempt to explain how, during its formative stages, the current generation is being modified to suit the Establishment’s desire for a homogeneous, sexually sterile, western human type.

From the very beginning, when the first communities began organizing themselves through governments, the issue of sexuality and the legislation of laws pertaining to it were central in their governance. This can be seen codified in so many religious books and clay tablets that, for economy’s sake, I need not develop this notion any further. For the most part, the intended effect was to introduce commonly understood standards of practice, or forms of engagement when it came to marriage, procreation, and healthy sexual practices. As communities evolved into ever more complex polities, institutions were required to handle the various branches of society where oversight was needed, such as policing, courts of law, or currency creation. These were originally intended to serve a social purpose, that is, for the greater good of the people the laws were supposed to represent. As time went by, however, the idea of government began to change.

Special interests always had a hand in ruling society; no kingdom could have governed without them. But with the slow decay of monarchical absolutism and the rise of the elitist schools of governance, these special interest groups now had greater sway in politics. They became sponsors of new social theories, which included a belief that the rule of law must be expanded to all facets of the civilization—and this meant bigger government. The last three centuries of Western political history, it can be argued, has been the struggle between the two ideologies of pervasive versus minimal governance. However that may be, the rise of Marxism and the twentieth century idea of total government ensured that the Statist philosophy of rule would be the contemporary method of choice, as so many predicted not too long ago.

So, what does this have to do with pan-sexual delusions?

In a word: everything. Despite some attempts by a few good politicians to impede the process, the increasing centralization of government and bureaucratic overreach, particularly in the EU, Canada, and the USA, means that a massive expansion of law codes and legislation has been made possible. In addition to this, all of the entities above have a ruling class that is infatuated with cultural Marxist social theory, a model that offers complete control over society and the individual. Furthermore, considering that cultural Marxist philosophy is, practicably speaking, a social engineering model, there is now the potential to create a completely new human type. And if absolute power is their goal, the last thing they would want is a confident, heterosexually virile, independently minded population that, by its very nature, poses as an existential threat to their political monopoly. Rather, over a generation or two, permit the introduction of phthalate esters into the food chain, allow t he unimpeded rise of estrogens to build up in boys, and testosterone in girls. Forcefully legislate sex education curricula into primary schools, with particular consideration given to LGBT attitudes, and sexual confusion will become the engine of society.

Hence, a gender-confused sexual dysphoria becomes a key opening, or vector point, into the very heart of a people. Moreover, I contend that sexual confusion is the weapon of choice that the establishment has chosen to use against Western populations, whose organic and cultural integrity will become so splintered so as to seem like the entire social order has collective schizophrenia. There is ample evidence to suggest that Western governments have had a preoccupation with scientific research pertaining to the control of human populations over the past 100 years, particularly in the fields of eugenics and psychiatry. Other tactics such as the creation of divisional social issues, cultural Marxist regimentation, and the institutionalization of state dependents have done endless harm. But nothing offers more power to a ruling class than the absolute control over the reproductive ability of a population, period.

Furthermore, new lifestyles and, more crucially, the ideology that guides them, wrecked the nuclear family model within two generations. Children were now being raised by single mothers, next door neighbours, and television sets. The transmission of core family values has ended. Traditional archetypes and the philosophical relationship between family members has been dismantled. To make things worse, agricorporations and synthetic foods companies insist on unhealthy marketing schemes which has drastically altered Western eating habits. Untested industrial materials, plastics, biotoxins, chemically-caused allergies, vaccinations, and rampant depression are all coalescing to target entire populations in a very short span of time. So it is no coincidence, in my opinion, that the sudden rise of autism and gender dysphoria both occurred nearly at the same time. The difference being that Autism is not a mental illness, nor is it state sponsored.

Included with the above, the least considered cause of the gender-confused generation (and this is statistically borne out) is the fatherless household. In the US alone, about 30% of all teenagers suffering from gender dysphoria come from single mother homes. Realistically, however, the rate is probably much higher. The father archetype influences personality and sexual awareness far more profoundly than the mother; for it is the primordial function of the father archetype to promote the fundamental distinguishing of opposites and, consequently, differentiation of various unconscious contents. Carl Jung wrote: “There is no consciousness without discrimination of opposites”. For so many now, it is also the lack of a father that has brought them to this unhappy place. When the consciousness centers are not being lit up, the ability to discriminate between opposites (ie. sexes) is handicapped. It is that simple.

The long term consequences of the Western Elite’s tinkering in social engineering could not have been known to them, but they struck gold nevertheless. And what are the odds they will let a patriarchal model flourish once again in the West? I should think they would rather it burn like a funeral pyre than let go of this halachic power. Let them just try…



The Attack on the Traditional German Family

Germany, which has become the model upon which the entire West will be refashioned, amidst its own self-abolishment, has yet again made it very clear that the traditional notions of what it is to be “German” are no longer reconcilable. In a strange, horrifyingly obvious attempt to impose the new social narrative last February, the widely-circulated parenting magazine, Baby und Familie, published an article that embodied wholly the decline of European civilization.

The title of the piece was Gefahr von Rechts, or Danger from the Right. In it was depicted an artist’s renderings of solely blonde mothers with their blonde children in various settings such as playgrounds or day care centers. However, the accompanying text was thinly veiled, deliberately anti-German doublespeak. The writer warned of a rise in “right-wing” extremism amongst middle class native Germans, especially in the eastern rural areas. Parents, the writer cautioned, should be vigilant at all times, but that the warning signs were easily detected if one knew what to look for. And what are these indicators, she asked?

1. If the children are “inconspicuous, cute, and engaged.”

2. The family is generally nice and dedicated to one another.

3. If the children are cleanly clothed, obedient, and not overly loud.

4. The parents and children do not have American logos on their clothing.

5. If the children exhibit attentiveness beyond their years.

6. Young girls who often exhibit “accurately braided hair and wear long skirts.”

7. If the parents try to build personal relationships with other parents.

8. Parents who want to build a “better community.”

9. If the family seems “too normal.”

So basically, if the parents and children are modeled on traditional German values and principles, then they are likely to be some kind of neo-Nazi kinsfolk. This underhanded betrayal of German culture is stomach-churning to say the least, but it has an ulterior objective that is less obvious: it intends to make a corrupted vision of an ideal family. This is not just an attack on Classical European values, it is an assault on the very fabric of society. The end result can only be a degenerate form of the Family paradigm. And for a magazine that receives government support, this is completely outrageous. One must come to the rational conclusion, then, that the German government is intentionally breaking down the moral standards of its own people, where things such as dedication towards others, sense of community, mindfulness, high self-esteem, and happiness within the family unit are held in contempt and no longer valued.

The NGO think tank that was consulted for this article, the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, is partly run by former Stasi agents whose mission has not changed in the 25 years since the Berlin Wall fell: Global Marxism and the annihilation of the nation state. If this means wiping out the cultural value systems of entire peoples, then so be it. The thin veneer of their operation uses the typical rhetoric of a pro-democratic, one-world-community organization: but the reality is quite the opposite. And the danger this group poses to Germans is far reaching. The fact that thousands of young, progressive liberals and socialists make up the bulk of its volunteer army gives it an impetus that will last for decades. The harm this will do shall continue for several generations, or at least until German identity is utterly put to death.

Anetta Kahane, the founder of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, has for years pushed the notion that Germany will fail as a state unless unmitigated millions of third world migrants enter the country as saviours. One of her closest associates, and foundation member, Julia Schramm, has even gone so far as to state that “Germans are not human,” and “Let the bombs fall, let it burn, betray Germany.” Heike Radvan, the well known third wave feminist and gender specialist, is also a contributor to this organization’s philosophical system. With such a nihilistic, self serving intelligentsia at its core, this group will effectively rush the German nation headlong into a nightmarish and brutal end…


*Originally published by the author on the Black Pigeon Speaks website, October 4, 2016